Wednesday, 9 May 2012
Monday, 6 February 2012
Saturday, 4 February 2012
Friday, 3 February 2012
Roseanne Barr Running for President as Green Party Candidate
Roseanne Barr has gone from sitcom comedy to a reality show set on her Hawaiian macadamia nut farm – and her latest venture is running for president! The comedienne and activist announced Thursday via Twitter that she will be running as a Green Party presidential candidate for 2012. Barr’s platform heavily stresses ending the influence of corporate money on politics and elections.
Barr made her interest in politics known over the past year as she appeared at countless Occupy events, and even joked on Jay Leno that she had an interest in running. The Green Party’s media coordinator, Scott McLarty, fully supports Barr’s intentions, stating that she is a strong candidate that supports the party’s beliefs.
Alongside Barr, medical doctor Jill Stein has also announced her candidacy. Stein, an environmental and health advocate, also previously ran for Massachusetts state representative and secretary of state under the Green-Rainbow Party. Out of eight interested in becoming candidates, the Green Party has so far only recognized Barr and Stein after filing with the Federal Election Commission.
The outspoken Barr’s ideas are pretty radical, and she definitely supports the 99% – she calls for the forgiving of student loans and other debt, plans to institute single-payer healthcare within 100 days of inauguration, and is even pro legalizing marijuana. Like the Green Party, she is extremely anti-war and interested in furthering environmental and green practices.
Although Barr anticipates Stein to nab the win, she intends to run until the convention in July. Despite whether Barr actually becomes a candidate or not, her celebrity and outspoken ways will surely move important issues like environmentalism, health care, and debt to the forefront of debate in a more outright way than political candidates have in the past.
Roseanne Barr: Is she serious about Green Party presidential bid?
Roseanne Barr: Is she serious about Green Party presidential bid?
The announcement by Roseanne Barr has given the Green Party the flash of media spotlight it has been lacking as the GOP candidates slog through their primaries.
Actress and reality show personality Roseanne Barr addresses the media during the Lifetime channel portion of the Press Tour for the Television Critics Association in Beverly Hills, California, last July.
Gus Ruelas/Reuters/File
Now that Roseanne Barr, doyenne of her own blue-collar 1980s sitcom, has announced her bid for the Green Party presidential nomination, she may have given the 2012 race just the lighter touch it could use. On the other hand, if her paperwork is any indication, she is quite serious about the bid.
Recent posts
- 02.03.12
Is Mitt Romney the Nevada front-runner? Yes, but . . . - 02.03.12
Roseanne Barr: Is she serious about Green Party presidential bid? - 02.03.12
Did Donald Trump endorse Mitt Romney because of China? - 02.02.12
Does it matter whom Donald Trump endorses? - 02.01.12
Why Ron Paul could rally in February caucuses
"I will barnstorm American living rooms," she said in a candidate questionnaire submitted to the party, according to the Associated Press. "Mainstream media will be unable to ignore me .... [M]ore importantly they will be unable to overlook the needs of average Americans in the run-up to the 2012 election."
But Ms. Barr hasn’t exactly been concentrating on a political résumé. The comedienne was most recently seen in a one-season cable reality TV show, “Roseanne’s Nuts,” detailing her macadamia nut farm life in Hawaii.
RECOMMENDED: Five comedians who ran for office
“I would say that she is not a serious candidate, if for no other reason than it’s not clear who she appeals to right now,” says Villanova University political science professor Lara Brown, author of “Jockeying for the American Presidency.”
She adds that if Barr is hoping to reach out to the youth vote – the demographic often likely to respond to an insurgent third-party candidate – young voters don’t remember her network TV show. “If this were someone like Chelsea Handler or even Tina Fey who is very visible right now, then it might be clearer who will pay attention to her bid,” Professor Brown says.
This year more than ever, third-party candidacies are a long shot, according to Brown. In some previous elections, “voters head into the booth and say, ‘This is just “Tweedledee” and “Tweedledum,” ’ ” she says, referring to the major-party candidates, “and they look for an alternative like Ralph Nader or even Ross Perot.” But this year, she says, voters are more divided into camps, and many are keenly aware that a few votes made a difference in the 2000 election.
They know now that those votes cast for Ralph Nader possibly changed the election, Brown says. "And most voters, if they had it to do over again, probably would take that third-party vote back,” she says.
And then there is the ticklish money question, points out James Broussard, professor of political science at Lebanon Valley College in Annville, Pa. In the case of Barr, he says, her considerable wealth conflicts just a tad with her self-identification as the flag bearer for the 99 percent.
“This is a bit like Trump leading a campaign against gambling,” Professor Broussard says with a laugh, but adds, “All these candidacies depend on resources, so if she is willing to throw some of her own money into it, who knows?”
The bid certainly has given the Green Party the flash of media spotlight it has been lacking as theGOP candidates slog through their primaries. “We may be laughing now,” says Republican strategist David Johnson, who worked on Bob Dole’s 1988 presidential campaign, “but even as this announcement comes out, people are clicking on the Green Party website to figure out if it’s for real and to find out more.”
This is an election year for many posts besides the presidency, Mr. Johnson notes, and the Green Party has been building momentum in many smaller races across the country, such as county commissioner and city council elections in Colorado and Minnesota. “The more the Green Party seems like a legitimate contender, the more grass-roots races it will be able to win,” he says.
The Green Party will pick its candidate at its Baltimore convention in July. It’s not clear what would happen to Barr’s TV career if she is chosen. NBC reportedly just picked up a pilot for “Downwardly Mobile,” starring Barr as a mobile home park boss who serves as a surrogate mother to park residents.
“This could just be a preshow blitz for her,” points out Johnson, who adds, “After all, the big reward for aspiring politicians these days is not a slot on the ticket, but a TV show. Just look at Mike Huckabee and Sarah Palin.”
Eddie Long Is Not a 'King'
React
Follow
I am writing this response to a YouTube video circulating widely on the internet in in which Eddie Long, the troubled pastor of the New Birth Missionary Baptist Church in Atlanta GA is apparently crowned king with the ritual use of a Jewish Torah scroll. (The reader may know him for the recent scandal in which he was accused by five young men of sexual misconduct. After initially denying the allegations, he went into settlement talks with them.) A number of specious claims are made during the ritual which I would like to refute.
The unidentified man who, (in the YouTube video to which I had access he is identified subsequently as Ralph Messer), represents himself as a Jew. He may well be some sort of Messianic Jew, a person who claims Jewish heritage and recognizes Jesus as the Son of God, but who is not part of one of the major Jewish movements: Orthodox, Reform, Conservative, Reconstructionist, Reform, Renewal. He does not, however, represent recognizable Jewish thought or practice in his (mis-) representations of the Torah and other Jewish sancta -- or for that matter, New Testament and Christian biblical interpretation and theology.
- The claim that Holocaust Torahs cannot be insured "because there are no more" is patently false. They are regularly insured as are other one of a kind objects d'art, i.e. the works of Picasso.
- The Torah cover is not a "foreskin." Hyper-masculine, hyper-sexualization of the Torah reduces the holy Torah to a problematic phallic symbol -- God's? or Long's? -- and categorizes the most destructive behaviors associated with New Birth ministries in recent years. Grammatically and symbolically, the Torah is feminine in Hebrew and is personified as "She," as in "She is a Tree of Life," in Prov. 3:18.
- The Temple in Jerusalem was not a synagogue or Beth Midrash, where Torah scrolls were kept and studied.
- The Torah wrapper is not referred to as a "belt of righteousness."
- The tree in the vision in the book of Revelation whose "leaves are for the healing of the nations," (22:2), is a fruit tree -- not a Torah scroll -- and the text does not say that there are "39 leaves" as claimed in the video.
- The claim that "only one of great authority" is given a "finger" to touch the scroll is patently false. Any bar or bat mitvah, girl or boy, woman or man, who has completed the rite of passage, can chant the Torah according to the (minhag) custom in their congregation. Torah scroll pointers, called "hands," (yadayim), not "fingers" are common gifts and possessions in Jewish families and communities.
- The claim that 90 percent of the Jews in the world have "never seen, approached or touched" Torah scrolls is utterly without foundation. The Torah is taken out of the Ark during Shabbat and other services; it is processed through the assembly twice where people reverence it (Her!) by touching and kissing it/Her.
- The frequent references to significant numbers may be an attempt to mimic the Jewish mystical tradition of Gematria that elicits meanings from numbers and their contexts. The speaker is devising his own system without reference to any of the classical texts in Judaism, frequently by simple free- and word-association.
- There is no verse in the scriptures where Jesus calls himself "the eternal government of God" as claimed by the speaker.
- The point that "these" -- presumably Torah scrolls or just Holocaust Torah scrolls are only given to "cities in need of anointing" is false. Individuals, families and religious communities own and commission Torah scrolls and keep or give them as they see fit, to synagogues, Jewish seminaries and other schools and museums.
- Even if the speaker identifies as a Jew and has Israeli citizenship, he does not speak for "the Jewish people," "the land of Israel" or "the state of Israel."
- His address of Eddie Long as a biblical or Israelite king is without foundation in the scriptures or in reality.
- The notion that there is such a thing as a "king chromosome" is a fiction, as is the claim that it is kohenic, that is priestly; the Israelite and Judean monarchs -- there were queens as well -- were not priests.
- The man's articulation of what "God wants," is to say the least unsubstantiated outside that particular setting.
- The man never says how he knows that none of Long's ancestors or relatives has ever seen a Torah scroll.
- While there are some traditional reflections on the human body -- including DNA and chromosomes -- in the mystical Kabbalistic tradition, the speaker is crafting a verbal montage without reference to the classical texts or their theologies.
- He attributes a quote to "Jewish doctors" stereotyping an entire community as conflating cellular biology with his Hebrew mysticism without actually naming or quoting any single "Jewish doctor" who holds such an opinion.
- The "crowns" in Torah scrolls stem from a particular -- now-normative -- calligraphy style, but other types of calligraphy have been used through the ages to produce legitimate Torah scrolls.
- The claim that the kings of Israel were crowned with Torah scrolls wrapping them has no foundation in the biblical text. According to the bible's own chronology the written Torah did not come into existence until the reign of King Josiah in the sixth century BCE (2 Kgs 22), some four hundred years after the time of David. However, the great second century rabbi Hanina ben Teradion, was however wrapped in a Torah scroll and burned alive in his martyrdom. Perhaps he has confused or conflated the traditions.
- While the Torah poles are called, etzim, "trees," they are not known as "justice and blessing."
- The speaker's claim that his speaking "life" to Eddie Long as a Jew has some meaning, is utterly without meaning.
- The speaker's prediction that the ritual -- his antecedent is unclear -- will arouse either "death" or "life" in someone -- Long? Or the congregation? -- is his own Gnosticism, knowledge that is not shared by those outside that particular setting.
- There is no precedent for presenting anyone, even a fictitious Israelite-ish monarch with the Torah wrapper.
- The donning of the tallit, prayer shawl, is done by those who have completed their bar or bat mitzvah -- whatever it was that just occurred, it had none of the requisite elements of a bat or bar mitzvah. In addition the tallit is donned by pulling it over one's head and reciting the traditional prayer, which was not done. It is also not draped like a clergy stole.
- The elevation of Long lifted in the chair by four men seems to have been borrowed from Jewish wedding festivities and has noting to do with coronation; there is no evidence of this practice among Israelite or Judean monarchs.
- The Aaronic blessing (Num 6:24-26) is a blessing for the people and not a putative leader.
- It is unfortunate that the speaker chose to plunder the sacred traditions of Judaism as he invented novel interpretations of biblical texts and imagery affirm and elevate an individual who had admittedly broken the sacred trust between pastor and congregant.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)